Recently I started using the “Read More” feature. If you’re using WordPress you’ll see it in your composer, it’s a button with one white box on top, one white box on bottom, seperated by a dashed line.
A few people have commented on it, most saying they dislike it, and I wanted to let you know the reasons behind the change (and I’d like some feedback once you know why I did it).
1. Using the “click here to read more” option drives up my pageviews. Once you are working with advertising agencies that pay based on pageviews, this means more money (either because you are payed based on each click on your site, or because each click on your site makes you more advertising to advertisers so you can charge more (I belong to the latter group)). You see a lot of really big sites employing tactics like this, Perez for example.
2. Have you noticed a use a lot of pictures? Hello, that’s like my signature. And this often causes load time on the home page to lag, especially when I publish three picture heavy posts in a row, since without the truncation they all have to load at once. Shortening each post to just the first picture on the home page should make the www.thatwifeblog.com load a lot faster.
Now that you know the reasons, what do you think? This small change seems to have bumped by pageviews by around 15-20% (though that’s hard to calculate because pageviews vary based on how interesting my content is!) It is a change, but it’s small enough that if dozens and dozens of you spoke up and said it wasn’t worth it to you I would think about changing it back.















August 18th, 2011 on 8:35 am
I like it!
It is much easier to load your site now.
I say keep it.
Reply
Grace Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 8:50 am
I agree with Amy!
My internet connection has trouble with lots of images due to Singapore government monopoly of telecoms. Now it’s easier to view your site.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 8:42 am
I usually read through google reader and haven’t noticed a difference. Now that I click over to your site, I’m not a huge fan of the links. If it’s going to benefit you then go for it though. It is your blog after all!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 8:46 am
I also read through a reader, so I haven’t noticed a change. But I think you should do what works for the direction you want to head with your blog. Being that the blog and your photography business are how you try to earn money, I don’t think it’s unreasonable.
Reply
Zoe Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 11:39 am
Agreed. Partial RSS feeds bug me, and if I didn’t read your blog through Google Reader, I’d probably find it a little annoying and not click on posts that I didn’t think I wanted to read more of. As it stands, I’ve noticed no change because of Google Reader and ultimately you do what’s best for your blog.
Reply
kylydia Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 1:54 pm
Thank you! Partial RSS feeds are evil, pure and simple. 99% of the time, I unsubscribe from a site’s feed if it goes partial.
With that little rant over, I haven’t noticed a difference. If I happened to read on-site, I wouldn’t have a problem with clicking an extra link. Speedier load times are always nice.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 8:52 am
I visit your page directly and have noticed that it is much quicker to load your page now, however I don’t mind either way. Whatever works for you works for me. I mean seriously, the longer loading page hasn’t kept me from visiting your blog daily (hourly).
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:02 am
The only thing that seriously, SERIOUSLY gets under my skin is partial RSS feeds. Other than that, if it works well for your blog/you go for it.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:07 am
Doesn’t bother me any.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:08 am
I like it. I usually read your blog at work and my work computer is sssslllllooooowwwww. The read more feature really does help with my load time.
Reply
Erin Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 10:54 am
Haha…This is actually one of the big reasons I DON’T like it. I also usually read at work with a slow computer/internet connection, but it takes sooooo much longer to open multiple pages than to let one page load. Totally not worth it.
I think I’m already hooked on Jenna, but it definitely keeps me away from new blogs I come across.
Also, Jenna…I’m confused by the advertising reason…I don’t SEE any advertising…where is it?? Maybe that’s what’s hidden behind the blue box on your page that holds content work has deemed not fit for me to see.
Reply
Life On Mulberry Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 12:10 pm
I agree with Erin – I’d rather let one page load than have to click through multiple entries to load the pages.
Don’t know that it has to be said, but yes, it is your blog so yes, of course, its your place to do what you like with the layout!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:09 am
I like it. I might even try it myself, mostly for the load times since I too, tend to have a lot of pictures.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:09 am
I don’t like it. I never had a problem loading your site before so to me it’s just takes extra time now to load your site because you are making me click on all these extra links. Please go back to the old way!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:11 am
I noticed it, but it didn’t both me at all. I say keep it!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:32 am
I’m not a big fan of it. I like to scroll down without clicking. I’ve found that since you’ve added the new feature, I haven’t been clicking the link to read the rest of the article. Maybe I’m too lazy, though!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:35 am
I’m reading in google reader, no difference-which is great. I really enjoy reading you posts everyday, but probably will stop if I have to jump links in order to do it. Some of my friends blogs switched, and I tried to go along with it for a few weeks, but eventually dropped them from reader and stopped visiting their blogs because it became time consuming and annoying.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:36 am
I’m not a big fan, but you have good reasons to do it and it probably won’t prevent me from reading! It’s nice knowing the “why” behind it more.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:36 am
It takes only two extra seconds for me to click on the link and if it drives up your pageviews (= profit), I say keep it. It’s not a huge inconvenience (really, it’s not an inconvenience at all) for readers to have to click through to read the full post, and if it’s a way to help you to be adequately/more adequately compensated for your time/work, it’s perfect.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 9:58 am
I saw it when I checked your blog via iPhone. The rest of the entry wouldn’t load, but I’m not sure if it was a one time thing
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:03 am
I’m not a fan since I like to scroll down without extra clicking, but it’s understandable given your reasons.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:03 am
I read through a reader so I don’t notice a change either. But I did previously notice that your picture-heavy posts sometimes take a long time to load, and that’s just for one post (I often click through to read/post comments). So if it helps your overall site load time, and makes you some extra money, I think that’s definitely worth it. I have never considered the “read more” links on a homepage to be an inconvenience, since as others mentioned above, it just takes an extra second or two to click the link.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:06 am
I read you through Google Reader, so I don’t have a problem with it. The big problem for me (and when I stop reading) is when I have to click through to see more on the actual site instead of being able to read the whole thing in Reader.
I like that you are honest about why!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:07 am
I dont’ mind the new feature at all. I think it’s a bonus if it helps your generate income–go for it!
I will say though… with or without the ‘read more’ feature–your blog STILL takes a long time to load. (I do wait for it because I like to see what you post). This might be to my internet connection, (I live in the Canadian Arctic–and connections are slow at the best of times).
I was just curious though.. do you ‘shrink’forget the technical term–but make them a smaller file size… your photos before uploading them? and your amazing header–is it possible to make that a small file size as well? I just find often the lag for me is not in the posts but the actual structure of your blog-site!
Again, I might be the only person experiencing this–so don’t change on JUST my account! You need to do what works for you!
Have a great day!
Sarah
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:11 am
It’s a little annoying, but when we click hundreds of times per day, what’s one more? I really doubt that a dedicated reader is going stop visiting over one extra click. You absolutely should be paid for your entertaining and informative posts!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:13 am
If you were to go partial RSS feeds, I would drop you. I do not bother with sites that give me only partial feeds. (But this might not mean anything to you as I rarely, if ever, comment.) Partial posts on your site……annoying, but o.k. Obviously if I am interested enough in the content of the post to click over from a reader to read through the contents, etc. then it isn’t a big deal.
The change makes a bit more sense since your posts are picture heavy. If it were to just to generate revenue…..I would would be more peeved as well.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:32 am
I find partial posts incredibly annoying, but you have your reasons and I can respect that. Most of the time I’m in Google Reader, though, and I will say that I have dropped many of the “big bloggers” because they switched to partial RSS. I only have so much time each day to read blogs and I don’t want to spend it clicking around.
The thing that annoys me the most are blogs with only one post per page. Seriously?
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:40 am
I don’t mind it much (because I know it’s just a few extra seconds, as people above me have pointed out), however, I admit that there have been a few posts that I have skipped over just because they don’t hold my interest enough to click on them. Normally I read every single post of yours, no matter how much it piques my interest or not, but now I find myself only clicking on the ones that really interest me, simply because of the minute effort of clicking. Maybe that’s ridiculous or lazy of me?
I’ve never had a problem with load time for your page, but perhaps you could just put the particularly pic heavy posts behind a cut instead of all of them?
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:45 am
I don’t mind it at all, especially since it drives up your pageviews. You’ve been creating a blogging community here for us for almost 3 years now, totally unpaid, pouring yourself into high quality blog posts and incredibly shot and edited photography to go with it. The least I can do is take a millisecond to do one extra click- I’ll think of it as retroactive pay for the last three years, and if all I have to do is an extra click, I think I’m getting a good deal
Plus, I do notice it loads much faster!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:48 am
I only HATE “read more” when it says it in my google reader. I like when I only go to blogs that it just gives me a teaser of the post and I can choose to read more or not – I hate when people set up their RRS feeds to only be teasers and make people go to the website to read the post (like babble does – so i unsubscribed to all of their blogs). I think my grammar is poor today but I’m not going to edit. I’m pregnancy tired today!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:48 am
It only really bothers me when I have to visit the site from the reader…but I don’t have to do that with yours!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:55 am
I’m not a fan of it. To be honest, I haven’t clicked through on anything. Like someone else said, maybe that’s just me being lazy!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:59 am
I didn’t even notice until you pointed it out so I say keep it if it’s making you money!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 11:01 am
I don’t mind it at all! Before, when I was at work, I would usually get through most (if not all) of the post before the page would finish loading entirely. Now it’s much faster, and if it helps you make more $$, more power to you!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 11:05 am
Yeah, no big deal. Some times your posts are quite slow loading, even on my nice fast internet. This helps.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 11:13 am
I think you have made the best choice for your blog. I agree about the load times, and improving click through rate. I would suggest to the people who don’t like it to subscribe to your post feed so then they can get updated info immediately without having to click on anything.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 11:36 am
I click through from google reader so I didn’t even notice!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 11:44 am
I don’t like it. I’m much less inclined to read a whole article. It seems like the story is too broken up.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 11:53 am
I like it. I agree it helps your main page load much quicker, which I like because I am impatient
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 11:55 am
honestly, I don’t like it. I actually just commented on another blog who asked the question about this…. I don’t come. It’s petty and lazy yes, but if I have to click into a post, and then click back out to read another, I don’t. I noticed when you first did it, and I will admit that I haven’t come back as much…. and I haven’t noticed that it loads any faster either. Sorry!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 12:16 pm
I don’t usually like it, but I completely understand because of the amount of photos. And I agree with others, I am reading via GR, and as long as you don’t go with a partial feed…
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 12:18 pm
Having to click on a blog post = first world problems.
Reply
Sophia Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 12:31 pm
YES. Thank you. The fact that we can sit in front of computers and express our “needs” as it concerns clicking versus non-clicking on a post that we are lucky enough to be literate enough to read is a great reminder of that.
Reply
Errign Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 2:45 pm
I like to affectionately refer to things like this as my “whitegirlproblems”, but I hope I didn’t just offend anyone by admitting that.
Reply
Kelli Nicole Reply:
August 20th, 2011 at 9:02 am
Hahahahaha. Yes.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 12:20 pm
I read through Google reader so I didn’t notice. PLEASE don’t go to partial RSS feed. I hate that enough that I usually stop following blogs that do it that way.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 12:31 pm
I love that you did it! Just like you said…it makes uploading your page MUCH quicker!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 12:33 pm
Oh, one thing to add- as a frequent commenter, I had to click on “view comments/leave a comment” (I can’t remember what it said) ANYWAY. So, now, instead of clicking on that, I just click on read more.
Has anyone else thought of this? If you are a frequent commenter here, or even if you just frequently read the comments out of interest, it ends up being the same amount of clicks…
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 12:38 pm
I’m another who reads through Google Reader and didn’t notice the change. I will say that shortened RSS feeds bug me a bit, but they don’t hold me back from clicking through on my favorite blogs. I say keep whatever works out best for you.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 1:00 pm
hey Just found your blog!

COming to say hi and spread some LDS love!
~Jacinda
http://www.periwinklepixies.blogspot.com
http://www.periwinklepixies.etsy.com
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 1:45 pm
I like it.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 2:00 pm
I avoid reading websites that do this. I just want to come and browse quickly, not spend all day redirecting to new pages.
Reply
tj Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 2:22 pm
this! Exactly!
Reply
Julia Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 4:36 pm
This is exactly what I wanted to say!
Reply
Hannah Lundberg Reply:
August 19th, 2011 at 3:09 am
Isn’t that a bit selfish? Jenna does all this work to entertain us, for free, and the least we can do is take five seconds to click through so she can make some income and keep writing this great blog.
Reply
Angela Reply:
August 19th, 2011 at 7:51 am
Jenna clearly wants to monetize. If she weren’t getting something from the blog, she wouldn’t do it. She’s a smart businesswoman who’s asking for input from her readership, and these people are giving it.
Reply
Hannah Lundberg Reply:
August 20th, 2011 at 7:27 am
My point is this: what is wrong with wanting to monetise?
Jenna has been upfront about that and the problem is that it seems many readers want the blog without anything that comes with the writer getting anything other than intangible gains from it. I personally think it is selfish.
I get frustrated with how many blog readers wants all the content without ‘paying’ for it. It’s like asking for Vogue for free.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 2:20 pm
I don’t like it. I’ve already found myself reading less of the full posts… but I seem to be in the minority! I’m sure I will still click read more when it is a particularly good post!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 2:33 pm
I didn’t notice because I follow through Google Reader but (and I’m being totally honest here) not matter how much I like a blog I won’t go through the trouble of clicking through to read the entire post. I don’t know if it’s laziness or what but I won’t follow people who don’t display their whole posts in Reader.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 2:47 pm
Clicking through is not my favorite thing ever, but in the scheme of things, I don’t see it as a big deal. I would recommend perhaps making your first post totally visible, and then the ones to follow click-through. I read Carrots & Cake a lot and she started doing that & I think it’s a nice compromise for those of us who boycott Google Reader. Overall though, am I going to stop reading your blog because of click throughs? No.
Reply
Amanda Smith Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 2:59 pm
I like this idea of making the newest post totally visible with the older posts having the “Read More” feature. It’s a great compromise for those too lazy to click an extra button and those of us who don’t mind.
Reply
Zoe Reply:
August 18th, 2011 at 6:29 pm
ohhh that is an awesome idea!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 3:01 pm
I don’t really mind. I do find it a bit annoying (and this is a bit picky) that when I open the whole post and read through it I end up at the bottom of the post or comments and have to scroll all the way to the top to move on to the next post. When you don’t have to click through then the next post is right there. I love blogs with ‘newer post, older post’ at the top and the bottom of each page.
I also like Errign’s suggestion of the new post being full length, but maybe that doesn’t increase your clicks in the same way?
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 3:57 pm
I was just about to suggest what Errign wrote. Post of the day in full, previous posts with “read more”. That’s what I’m trying to do on my blog!
(Does that defeat the advertising piece, though?)
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 4:07 pm
It’s terrible.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 4:35 pm
I LOVE “read more” tabs. They make it quicker to browse through the site, and I can open individual posts in new tabs much easier, plus faster load time on my iPad!
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 5:07 pm
I don’t like it. I don’t get much time to check, just on the subway during my commute and now it takes twice as long on my phone, or even longer if I have multiple posts to read. ,
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 5:39 pm
I hadn’t noticed the change because I read you in an rss reader and only click over to comment. As long as you don’t go to RSS partial feed, I have no problem with it. I personally think RSS partial feeds are evil and usually stop following a blog if they go that route.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 5:51 pm
Doesn’t bother me at all because I just read in Google Reader. The only time I open to your actual blog is if I want to read/leave a comment or if I’m searching for a previous post. In the latter instance, I think it’s nicer because there’s less to scroll through to find the right post.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 6:06 pm
I don’t really like it. However, as long as if I click the “back” button & it takes me to the same place on the previous page (not back up to the top), then I am okay with it. I really hate having to scroll back down to get to the next post.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 6:48 pm
I have to say I hate them! And it makes me not willing to read more. Unless I really really want to read the rest of the post. And as of lately I haven’t seen many posts that I would click on the ‘Read More’ link.
But as others have said, it is your blog and you get to decide how you want to handle it.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 6:52 pm
Like a lot of commenters, most, if not all of my blog reading happens in a rss reader. In bed, on my iPhone before I get up and greet the day. I know lots of people who unsubscribe from partial RSS feeds, but like most things there is a fine balance. For partial to work for me, the hook has to be good. Or I have to be so dedicated to the content that the hook becomes irrelevant. There are only two feeds (of 150+) that I click over on ultra truncated posts. There are probably a dozen or so longer truncated posts that I always click over, mostly food blogs where the recipe is posted after the truncation. This applies to partial blog posts too. My point is, the hook. A writer needs to post enough well written story with a great picture to get clicks. In my view, easier than getting people to click over just to comment (maybe reflective of my antisocial tendencies.) I think that’s it. It’s pretty early, so I don’t have full cognition going on. One more thing, the mobile view of your home page is a lot less pretty than I was anticipating. Probably, not many people see it, but it doesn’t have the same awesome design sensibilities of the rest of your brand. -cheers, Matilda.
Reply
Kayakgirl73 Reply:
August 19th, 2011 at 2:23 pm
Love the mobile page makes it easy to read on my Android.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 6:54 pm
I really dislike it. I’ve been meaning to e-mail you. I get that you make more money off clicks, but it almost feels like “cheating” your reading audience. However, know that I know about it, perhaps I will read you from the google reader instead.
Reply
Hannah Lundberg Reply:
August 19th, 2011 at 3:12 am
How is it cheating her readers? It is such a tiny little thing for us to do, when she has provided us with free entertainment, advice and even some education about a variety of issues for nearly three years. More, if one has been reading since her That Bride/Bee days.
I am just flabbergasted by how self absorbed some readers are…
Reply
Sophia Reply:
August 19th, 2011 at 10:31 am
You feel cheated because after 3 years of making 0 money on her blog- a blog where she posts daily almost 100% of the time, and a blog where she also answers hundreds upon hundreds of formspring questions- she’s trying to do what every other monetized blog does? I think it’s more of a “cheat” that I could come to her blog, read 10 posts on the main page, and she only got one “click”. If I read 10 posts, I think that her stats should reflect that. The only way to get a true representation of how many posts each reader is reading is making each one a click. The way it was before, someone who just read one post in 5 minutes counted the same as someone who read 10 and spent half an hour on her site. There is a huge difference between the two.
Reply
Kellis Reply:
August 19th, 2011 at 12:44 pm
Wow, Hannah, I’m flabbergasted at how judgmental some readers are. I think it’s interesting that you make such a negative judgement about me after 4 lines of text. Especially since I put cheated in quotation marks. But I’ll take some of the blame, I did leave this comment quickly,and the end of a busy work day. I did not give the comment the proper thought or wording.
To elaborate; from my perspective I HAVE been reading and clicking for 3 years. I visit the site pretty much everyday, sometimes comment, and will often go back and re-read old posts… the sum of which IS increasing the page clicks Jenna receives from me. I tend to go back and visit archives and re-read older posts. I’m NOT against Jenna making money off her blog. Obviously she should get some compensation for her time and energy invested in her blog. HOWEVER, in the same vein everyone who reads daily is giving something back to her. Without readers she’d have zero clicks. So when I said “cheated” I think I meant more like it seems like a blatant attempt to purposefully garner more clicks from readers… and I, personally don’t really appreciate it. (I hope people will respect that it’s MY opinion.) To me, the “click to read more” doesn’t give you a new post… it’s just another click to finish reading what you’ve already started (and already clicked once to read).
I visit That Wife pretty much everyday, so that’s at least one click per day. I sometimes comment, so there’s another click. I will go back and look for old articles and recipe’s. Jenna IS getting numerous daily clicks off me. And PERSONALLY (and you obviously don’t agree with me, which is fine – it’s a free country) I feel like forcing extra clicks on readers is a tad unfair. Obviously, it’s totally Jenna’s decision as this is HER blog. But she asked for our opinions and I gave mine. I really don’t appreciate people jumping all over me.
I would also like to add that I love the idea where the first 2-3 posts are completely loaded, and then the rest are “click to read more” posts. I think it’s a nice compromise. Another blog I visit will only list 2 entries per page, which causes an extra page click if the reader wants to see more/older content. I also like the idea that people can avoid the clicks in google reader.
Reply
Jenna Reply:
August 19th, 2011 at 12:48 pm
I usually try to stay out of reader disagreements (because I don’t have the time to play referee as well as discussion instigator
), but I wanted to say that someone suggested the first post of the day be displayed in full, and the rest be abbreviated, and I really like this idea. I’m not sure how to do it though, and it might be something I can only afford once That Wife has generated enough revenue for me to pay for a makeover by someone who knows how to code something like that? Either way it’s something I’d definitely like to do for the future as I think it’s a nice way to please pretty much everyone.
Reply
Kellis Reply:
August 19th, 2011 at 3:20 pm
PS. Jenna, I love your blog. I’m a long time reader and do appreciate all you do with regards to your blogging and the time investment you make here. I will still come back and read even if you did keep every entry as “click to read more” (Although, I may not go for the extra click every entry! heh.)
I don’t even consider this a real disagreement. In my “real life” I don’t think I have EVER been called self absorbed. I feel like I got some harsh criticisms and was trying to explain.
I also really appreciate that you solicite your readers thoughts and opinons. I think it’s really classy. Peace out!
Reply
Hannah Lundberg Reply:
August 20th, 2011 at 7:37 am
I said ‘some readerS’. I referred to both you post and many others. I stand by the fact that it is a selfish attitude and that’s MY opinion.
Sophia is right. The ONLY way to get a true reflection of how much content we’re actually reading and therefore how many advertising opportunities there are is to click read more pageviews matter from that perspective, it’s not the click as such that matters. If she gets one click for a page of five posts, that’s just not an accurate reflection of how much content we’re reading or the time we’re spending on the site. Therefore, Jenna loses out. At least with how the site is currently coded. It’s a pretty standard approach when it comes to assessing the true readership of a site and tracking it for advertising purposes.
How that is ‘cheating’ is beyond me.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 7:59 pm
i don’t mind.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 8:19 pm
I understand the reasoning…but I’m the kind of “un-involved” blog reader that isn’t a big commenter (but a faithful reader!) and on any blog, if I see a “click here to read more” I usually don’t read more. As much as I like your blog and reading about you, I just don’t have that much interest. I find loading a whole different page to be somewhat annoying, especially when it’s for just one post.
I read your blog every day…but I haven’t yet clicked on one of the “read more” links. Looks like most people are okay with it, though, so good for you, if this is how you want it
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:28 pm
Hi Jenna!
I was happy to see you’re doing the “read more” cuts. Here in Guatemala I get to navigate at the “high speed” up to 1 GB of info/month before my speed gets reduced. And I like to check in at least a few times a week – so when there are lots of photo-heavy posts on the first page, I have to waste bandwidth loading photos I’ve already loaded one, two, or seven times. And when I reach the limit and they cut my velocity it makes everything even harder to load! Vicious cycle!
Plus it’s your blog, if it ups your clicks I think that’s great.
Steph
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 10:57 pm
I enthusiastically vote for keeping this feature!! One thing that has bugged me about being on your page when I am trying to find a post that was just a couple days ago is having to scroll past 30+ photos… or if you were having a really good day, more like 50! I’ve really wanted an instant “Next Post” thing like in Google Reader, but this will accomplish much of the same thing. I love your pictures, but when I’m looking for something else my scrolly finger gets tired.
Reply
August 18th, 2011 on 11:00 pm
PS, may I suggest a poll? Might make your life a little easier.
Reply
August 19th, 2011 on 3:14 am
Keep it!
I have told you before that I think you have to do everything you can to make this thing profitable. I think partial RSS feed suck, but I don’t see what the big deal is about clicking through. It takes five seconds and it benefits you.
Reply
August 19th, 2011 on 7:55 am
I don’t especially mind them, but I rarely click through unless the post seems really exciting. Like the Miety sandwich piece…didn’t click through, though I likely would have continued reading if it were all on one page.
Reply
August 19th, 2011 on 8:43 am
I visit your site directly and I noticed when you switched over to using read more because it is a bit more annoying. I think like someone mentioned earlier, I’ve found myself skipping a few posts lately because of the feature whereas before I pretty much never skipped a post of years. That being said, I never had a problem with your blog loading so the “read more” feature ups my reading/loading time rather than decreases it.
Reply
August 19th, 2011 on 9:59 am
I don’t mind clicking read more if it expands in the same page, rather than sending me to a new page. I really hate read more links in general, but I read through Google Reader so I didn’t notice a change until you posted about it.
Partial RSS feeds are evil, for sure!
Reply
August 19th, 2011 on 12:52 pm
I’m not a fan. I actually avoid pages that have a “read more” obligation, as it just isn’t user-friendly for me.
I will still read in google reader, but I’d be more likely to come to the site and click through if things weren’t truncated. I agree that if you had the first post be a full view post, and then your older posts have a “read more” button, then it would be a little easier.
Reply
August 20th, 2011 on 8:57 am
Doesn’t bother me and I’ve hardly noticed as I like to read the comments so I almost always click on a post anyway.
Reply
August 21st, 2011 on 6:46 pm
I don’t mind it at all. I like to click through to the blog anyway to read comments.
Reply
August 22nd, 2011 on 9:02 am
I don’t mind and I do not avoid blogs that do things like this.
I think you should keep it.
Reply
August 30th, 2011 on 9:09 pm
i had this on EAD and ditched it after a while. i’m neutral towards the whole thing, especially on a “personal” blog, but on EAD i felt it was a distraction and took away from the flow of the editorial, so even though it drove up page views i didn’t like it.
another thing to think about is that php is much more server-intensive than html, so more people loading each individual page’s template files = more server load (vs the html images taking a while to load b/c of their resolution). so, caching and reducing plugin load and increasing server power might be better in the long run from a slowness perspective.
Reply